Integrasi Tipologi Paradigma Sosiologi George Ritzer dan Margaret M. Poloma

Main Article Content

Suci Fajarni

Abstract

Sociology as a science has a variety of paradigms born of social scientists. Some of these are the sociology paradigm according to George Ritzer (which consists of a social facts paradigm, a social definition paradigm, a social behavior paradigm), and a sociology paradigm according to Margaret M. Poloma (consisting of a naturalistic / positivistic paradigm, a humanistic / interpretative paradigm, and a paradigm evaluative). This article aims to integrate between the sociology paradigm according to Ritzer and the sociology paradigm according to Poloma through comparative analysis that refers to paradigm elements consisting of ontological, epistemological, methodological, and axiological dimensions


Sosiologi sebagai sebuah ilmu memiliki beragam paradigma yang lahir dari para ilmuwan sosial. Beberapa diantaranya adalah tipologi paradigma sosiologi menurut George Ritzer (yang terdiri dari paradigma fakta sosial, paradigma definisi sosial, paradigma perilaku sosial), dan paradigma sosiologi menurut Margaret M. Poloma, (yang terdiri dari paradigma naturalistis/ positivistik, paradigma humanistis/ interpretatif, dan paradigma evaluatif). Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengintegrasikan paradigma sosiologi Ritzer dan paradigma sosiologi Poloma melalui analisis komparatif yang mengacu pada elemen-elemen paradigma yang terdiri dari dimensi ontologis, epistemologis, metodologis, dan aksiologis.

Article Details

How to Cite
Fajarni, S. (2020). Integrasi Tipologi Paradigma Sosiologi George Ritzer dan Margaret M. Poloma. Jurnal Sosiologi Agama Indonesia (JSAI), 1(2), 132-147. https://doi.org/10.22373/jsai.v1i2.554
Section
Research Articles

References

Agger, Ben. 2006. Teori Sosial Kritis; Kritik, Penerapan, dan Implikasinya. Yogyakarta: Kreasi Wacana.
Asrudin, Azwar. 2014. “Thomas Kuhn dan Teori Hubungan Internasional: Realisme sebagai Paradigma”. Indonesian Journal of International Studies (IJIS). 1(2).
Berger, Peter L., and Hanfried Kellner. 1981. Sociology Reintepreted. New York: Basic Books.
Burrell, G,. and G Morgan. 1994. Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis: Elements of the Sociology of Corporate Life. England: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
Catton, William, R. Jr. 1966. From Animistic to Naturalistic Sociology. New York: Mc. Graw-Hill Book Company.
Connell, Raewyn. 2006. “Northern Theory: The Political Geography of General Social Theory”. Theory and Society. 35(2).
Damayanti, Septi Nur,. dan Hamka Mujahid Ma’ruf. 2018. “Epistemologi Saintifik Thomas S. Kuhn terhadap Munculnya Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial.” Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia. 1(3).
Durkheim, Emile. 2014. The Rules of Sociological Method and Selected Texts on Sociology and its Method. Newly revised edition with a new introduction by Steven Lukes, translation (newly revised) by W.D. Halls. New York: The Free Press.
Friedrichs, Robert W. 1972. A Sociology of Sociology. New York: The Free Press.
Giddens, Anthony. 1967. Rules of Sociological Method: A Positive Craitique of Interpretative Sociolo¬gies. New York: Basic Books, Inc.
Littlejohn, S. J. 1992. Theories of Human Communication (4th ed.) Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Poloma, Margaret M. 2007. Sosiologi Kontemporer. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Ritzer, George. 1975. Sociology a Multiple Paradigm Science. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Ritzer, George. 1981. Toward an Integrated Sociological Paradigm. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Ritzer, George. 2001. Explorations in Social Theory: From Metatheorizing to Rationalization. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
Sugandi, Yulia. 2002. Rekonstruksi Humanis Menuju Praksis. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar