RESOLUSI KONFLIK DI ASIA: ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN ACEH DAN SRI LANGKA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22373/jai.v8i1.1943Keywords:
Conflict Study, Conflict Resolution Analysis, The Aceh Conflict, The Sri Lanka Conflict, Comparative Study of ConflictAbstract
The conflicts in Aceh and Sri Lanka share many similarities. However, there have been significantly different post-tsunami dynamics of conflict resolution in Aceh and Sri Lanka. In this article, the conflict resolution processes in Aceh and Sri Lanka will be compared. The main goals of this article are to (1) identify the main factors that failed to resolve the Sri Lanka conflict and the main factors that contributed to the successful post-tsunami resolution of the Aceh conflict, and (2) to determine whether the Sri Lanka conflict's failure to be resolved will repeat in Aceh if Aceh is faced with a similar natural disaster (tsunami). This article uses a qualitative approach with multiple case studies. As a result, the author uses a scientific model that includes additional concepts, expert opinions, and theories about conflict resolution to comprehend and analyze the resolution of the Aceh conflict and the conflict in Sri Lanka. These findings demonstrate that the success or failure of post-disaster resolution in two areas depends critically on the level of trust between conflicting parties. As a reaction, the violations of the Helsinki Accords' terms are more likely to trigger a third wave of conflicts than future natural disasters In Aceh.
References
Bekelcha, K. L. (2019). Conflict Theories. Global Journal of Religions, 1(4), 1-8. doi:10.28933/GJR
Brown, S., Cervenak, C., & Fairman, D. (1998, March). ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION PRACTITIONERS GUIDE. Retrieved from GSDRC: https://gsdrc.org/docs/open/ssaj1.pdf
Carpenter, S. L., & Carpenter, S. L. (2001). Managing Public Disputes: A Practical Guide for Government, Business, and Citizens' Groups. New York: Jossey Bass.
Cartier, J., Rudolph, J. L., & Stewart, J. (2001). The Nature and Structure of Scientific Models. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED461513.pdf
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry Reseach Design: choosing among five approaches (3rd ed ed.). United States of America: SAGE publication.
Fjelde, H., & Soysa, I. D. (2009). Coercion, Co-optation, or Cooperation? State Capacity and the Risk of Civil War, 1961-2004. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 26(1), 05-25. doi:10.1 177/0738894208097664
Gayatri, N. E., Priadarsini, N. W., & Nugraha, A. B. (2018). Strategi Pemerintah Sri Lanka dalam Menangani Kelompok Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam(LTTE). JURNAL HUBUNGAN INTERNASIONAL, 1(1), 1-14. Retrieved from https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/hi/article/view/37819
Jayanti, K. (2013). Konflik Vertikal Antara Gerakan Aceh Merdeka Di Aceh Dengan Pemerintah Pusat Di Jakarta Tahun 1976-2005. Al-Turāṡ, 19(1), 49-70. doi:https://doi.org/10.15408/bat.v19i1.3698
Jenkins-Smith, H., & Sabatier, P. (1994). Evaluating the Advocacy Coalition Framework. Journal of Public Policy, 14(2), 175-203. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/4007571
Klitzsc, N. (2014). Disaster Politics or Disaster of Politics? Post-tsunami Conflict Transformation in Sri Langka and Aceh, Indonesia. Cooperation and Conflict, 49(4), 554-572.
Lan, T. J., Patji, A. R., Soewarsono, Istiani, & Nurhasim, M. (2005). Penyelesaian Konflik di Aceh: Aceh dalam Proses Rekonstruksi dan Rekonsilasi. Jakarta: LIPI Press.
Miller, M., & Bunnell, T. (2013). Urban-Rural Connection: Banda Aceh Through Conflict, Tsunami and Desentralization. SPRINGER ASIA SERIES, 3(6), 83-98. doi:10.10007/978-94-007-5482-9_6
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2013). Organizational Behavior. In S. P. Robbins, Organizational Behavior (15 ed., pp. 1-676). United States: Pearson Education.
Rupesinghe, K. (1987). Theories of Conflict Resolution and Their Applicability To Protracted Ethnic Conflicts. Bulletin of Peace Proposals, 18(4), 527-539. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177%2F096701068701800405
Sinulingga, A. A., Halim, A., & Nasir, P. E. (2020). Bencana dan Konflik: Pelajaran dari Aceh dan Sri Langka. Andalas Journal of International Studi, IX(2), 203-217. doi:https://doi.org/10.25077/ajis.9.2.%25p.2020
Slettebak, R. T. (2012). Don’t blame the weather! Climate-related natural disasters and civil conflict. Journal of Peace Research, 41(3), 163-176.
Srikandi, A. B. (2011). Proses Penyelesaian Konflik antara Pemerintah Sri Langka dan Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (2000-2005). Sociae Polities, 12(32), 36-52.
Wahyuni, M., Isjoni, & Ibrahim, B. (2016). SEJARAH PEMBERONTAKAN GERAKAN ACEH MERDEKA (GAM) DI ACEH TAHUN 1976-2005. jurnal online mahasiswa fakultas keguruan dan ilmu pendidikan, 3(1), 1-11.
Yani, Y. P., & Siti Mutiah Setiawati. (2018). Proses Penyelesaian Konflik Aceh Melalui MoU Helsinki: Keberhasilan Pemerintah Indonesia Membuat GAM Menerima Konsep Self Government. Tesis.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY-SA) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal (See The Effect of Open Access);
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work;
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
