Mawah as a Religiously Embedded Economic Institution in Aceh: A Durkheimian Account of Selective Adaptation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22373/jsai.v6i2.8327Keywords:
Durkheim, functionalism, Islamic economics, mawah, profit-sharing, AcehAbstract
Traditional religious-economic institutions face increasing pressure from modernization and globalization, yet their persistence continues to complicate classical secularization theories. Mawah, a centuries-old Islamic profit-sharing system in Aceh, provides an important case for examining how religion remains embedded in economic life. This study analyzes mawah as both a religious and economic institution through Durkheim's functionalist theory, focusing on its persistence, transformation, and contemporary relevance as an Islamic economic alternative. This study employed a qualitative case study design with ethnographic elements, conducted in Pidie Jaya and Aceh Besar districts. Data were collected through focus group discussions, semi-structured interviews, and direct observations, complemented by recent scholarly literature. Analysis combined inductive coding with Durkheim’s concepts of solidarity, ritual, and collective effervescence, alongside Islamic jurisprudential principles such as al-adah muhakkamah (custom as a source of law). This study found that mawah persists as a post-secular institution through selective adaptation. Agricultural practices demonstrate rationalization tendencies, often resembling contractual arrangements, yet still operate within Islamic ethical frameworks of justice, trust, and collective welfare. By contrast, livestock-based mawah retains strong ritual dimensions through communal prayers, shared meals, and religious mediation, exemplifying collective effervescence. Trust networks rooted in religious authority and community membership remain central, providing moral legitimacy that purely instrumental arrangements cannot offer. This study contributes to sociology of religion by showing that religious institutions adapt through differential secularization rather than uniform decline. For policymakers, mawah illustrates how culturally grounded Islamic economic institutions can strengthen local development strategies while preserving social solidarity and religious authenticity.
References
Abdurrahman. (2015). Praktek mawah melalui mudharabah dalam masyarakat Aceh. Premise Law Journal, 2(1), 17-23.
Arrosid, H. M., & Kholis, M. (2021). Teori adat dalam qawaid fiqhiyah dan penerapannya dalam hukum keluarga Islam. Al-Hikam, 2(2), 23-30. https://doi.org/10.24239/familia.v2i2.28
Berger, P. L. (1999). The desecularization of the world: Resurgent religion and world politics. Eerdmans Publishing.
Bruce, S. (2002). God is dead: Secularization in the West. Blackwell Publishers.
Chaves, M. (1994). Secularization as declining religious authority. Social Forces, 72(3), 749-774. https://doi.org/10.2307/2579779
Durkheim, E. (1912). The elementary forms of religious life (K. E. Fields, Trans.). Free Press.
Eisenstadt, S. N. (2000). Multiple modernities. Daedalus, 129(1), 1-29.
Gorski, P. S. (2000). Historicizing the secularization debate: Church, state, and society in late medieval and early modern Europe, ca. 1300 to 1700. American Sociological Review, 65(1), 138-167. https://doi.org/10.2307/2657295
Habermas, J. (2008). Notes on post-secular society. New Perspectives Quarterly, 25(4), 17-29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5842.2008.01017.x
Hasan, A., Fahlevi, H., & Aliamin. (2020). Penerapan prinsip akuntansi syariah pada praktik transaksi tradisional mawah dan gala di Kabupaten Aceh Besar. Jurnal Kajian Akuntansi, 4(2), 135-155. https://doi.org/10.33603/jka.v4i2.3994
Heelas, P., & Woodhead, L. (2005). The spiritual revolution: Why religion is giving way to spirituality. Blackwell Publishing.
Labadi, S., Giliberto, F., Rosetti, I., Shetabi, L., & Yildirim, E. (2021). Heritage and the Sustainable Development Goals: Policy guidance for heritage and development actors. International Council on Monuments and Sites (ICOMOS).
Lehmann, D. (2014). Hope and religion: Sociological theory and the question of religion. Ashgate Publishing.
Maghfirah, F. (2020). Eksistensi konsep mawah sebagai penguat ekonomi masyarakat Aceh [Master's thesis, Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta]. UIN Sunan Kalijaga Repository. http://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/39157/
Mukhtasar, & Syahputra, A. (2020). Optimizing the mawah concept for the economy of the Aceh community. Iqtishoduna: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam, 9(2), 167-180. https://doi.org/10.36835/iqtishoduna.v9i2.558
Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2004). Sacred and secular: Religion and politics worldwide. Cambridge University Press.
Nouval, M., Faisal, F., & Manfarisyah, M. (2021). Penerapan nilai-nilai Islam dalam penyelesaian sengketa mawah: Studi kasus di Kabupaten Pidie. Suloh: Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Malikussaleh, 9(2), 53-73.
Pickering, W. S. F. (1984). Durkheim's sociology of religion: Themes and theories. Cambridge University Press.
Pierson, P. (2004). Politics in time: History, institutions, and social analysis. Princeton University Press.
Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford University Press.
Swatos, W. H., & Christiano, K. J. (1999). Secularization theory: The course of a concept. Sociology of Religion, 60(3), 209-228. https://doi.org/10.2307/3711934
Taylor, C. (2007). A secular age. Harvard University Press.
UNESCO. (2015). Culture: A driver and an enabler of sustainable development. UNESCO Publishing. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000235406
UNESCO. (2019). Culture | 2030 indicators. UNESCO Publishing.
United Nations. (2021). Culture and sustainable development. UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
Weber, M. (1930). The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism (T. Parsons, Trans.). Allen & Unwin. (Original work published 1905)
Wilson, B. R. (1982). Religion in sociological perspective. Oxford University Press.
Zaman, A. (2020). Islamic economics: A survey of the literature. Islamic Research and Training Institute. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1282786
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Fuadi Fuadi, Iskandar Iskandar, Danial Danial

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.