The Text–Culture–Living Hadith Model: An Anthropologically Informed Framework for Hadith Contextualization

Nazilatul Widad; Fahrur Razi

doi:10.22373/jsai.v7i2.10226

Authors

Nazilatul Widad Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya, Indonesia
Fahrur Razi Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22373/jsai.v7i2.10226

Keywords:

Hadith Contextualization, Anthropological Approach, Living Hadith, Hadith Criticism, Text–Culture Relations

Abstract

Hadith contextualization requires a method that preserves textual authority while accounting for the historical, cultural, and social conditions relevant to interpretation. Existing studies have examined contextual criticism, anthropological approaches, and living hadith, but these components are not always organized into an explicit analytical sequence with clearly differentiated evidentiary functions. This article formulates the Text–Culture–Living Hadith model as an anthropologically informed framework for hadith contextualization. It employs qualitative library research, content analysis, and conceptual synthesis of hadith sources, methodological scholarship, anthropological studies of Muslim practice, and living hadith research. The framework comprises seven stages: textual identification, attributed evaluation of hadith status, examination of asbab al-wurud and related reports, sociohistorical and cultural analysis, analysis of normative purpose and cultural form, examination of documented reception, and contemporary contextualization. Its application to the report “Whoever has hair should honor it” identifies the source as Sunan Abi Dawud, hadith 4163, and distinguishes it from the related report concerning disheveled hair in hadith 4062. The analysis shows that textual evidence, historical inference, social reception, and contemporary interpretation must be treated as related but non-equivalent forms of evidence. The model contributes a transparent procedural framework for connecting hadith criticism with cultural and reception analysis. It remains a conceptual proposal whose empirical usefulness requires testing through clearly defined textual corpora and field-based studies of Muslim reception.

References

Abu Dawud, Sulayman ibn al-Ash‘ath al-Sijistani. 2009. Sunan Abi Dawud. Edited by Shu‘ayb al-Arna’ut and Muhammad Kamil Qaraballi. Beirut: Dar al-Risalah al-‘Alamiyyah.

Asad, Talal. 1983. “Anthropological Conceptions of Religion: Reflections on Geertz.” Man 18(2):237–59. https://doi.org/10.2307/2801433.

Asriady, Muhammad. 2017. “Metode Pemahaman Hadis.” Ekspose: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum dan Pendidikan 16(1):314–23. https://doi.org/10.30863/ekspose.v16i1.94.

Berutu, Wahyu Rahmadsyah. 2023. “Teori Asbab al-Wurud dalam Hadis.” Holistic al-Hadis 9(1):55–74. https://doi.org/10.32678/holistic.v9i1.5910.

Bowen, John R. 1992. “On Scriptural Essentialism and Ritual Variation: Muslim Sacrifice in Sumatra and Morocco.” American Ethnologist 19(4):656–71. https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.1992.19.4.02a00020.

Brown, Jonathan. 2008. “How We Know Early Hadith Critics Did Matn Criticism and Why It’s So Hard to Find.” Islamic Law and Society 15(2):143–84. https://doi.org/10.1163/156851908X290574.

Creswell, John W. 2014. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

Febriyanto, Alfian, and Bambang Ekanara. 2020. “Antropologi untuk Pengkaji Hadis: Implementasi Integrasi Ilmu Hadis dan Antropologi pada Perguruan Tinggi Keagamaan Islam.” Jurnal Studi Hadis Nusantara 2(2):124–41. https://doi.org/10.24235/jshn.v2i2.7646.

Hallaq, Wael B. 1999. “The Authenticity of Prophetic Hadith: A Pseudo-Problem.” Studia Islamica 89:75–90. https://doi.org/10.2307/1596086.

Hirschkind, Charles. 2001. “The Ethics of Listening: Cassette-Sermon Audition in Contemporary Egypt.” American Ethnologist 28(3):623–49. https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.2001.28.3.623.

Jakfar, Tarmizi M. 2019. Sunnah Non-Tasyri‘iyah Menurut Yusuf al-Qardhawi. Banda Aceh: Naskah Aceh.

Khalilurrahman, As’ad, Budi Ichwayudi, Alwi Shobri, and Riko Akbar. 2024. “Interaksi Hadis dan Budaya: Interpretasi Ali Mustafa Yaqub dalam Kitab Al-Turuq Al-Sahihah fi Fahm Al-Sunnah Al-Nabawiyah.” Jurnal Diskursus Islam 12(2):195–213. https://doi.org/10.24252/jdi.v12i2.43307.

Krippendorff, Klaus. 2018. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

Mahmood, Saba. 2001. “Rehearsed Spontaneity and the Conventionality of Ritual: Disciplines of Salat.” American Ethnologist 28(4):827–53. https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.2001.28.4.827.

Mauludin, Hilman, and Ifah Khadijah. 2025. “Integrating Empathetic and Normative Approaches in Hadith Interpretation: A Contextual Study of Prophetic Ethical Communication in Da’wah.” Diroyah: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Hadis 9(2):302–18. https://doi.org/10.15575/diroyah.v9i2.48182.

Nurfatihah, Baiq Mira, Churun Jauharoh Al Aryachiyah, and Ahmad Ubaidillah Ma’sum Al Anwari. 2025. “Grounding an Integrative Paradigm in Reading and Interpreting Hadith Based on Scientific Approaches.” Jurnal Living Hadis 10(2):161–76. https://doi.org/10.14421/livinghadis.2025.6738.

Qudsy, Saifuddin Zuhri, and Subkhani Kusuma Dewi. 2018. Living Hadis: Praktik, Resepsi, Teks, dan Transmisi. Yogyakarta: Q-Media and Ilmu Hadis Press.

Rachmad, Yoesoep Edhie, M. Surno Kutoyo, Sunarno Sastro Atmodjo, Sari Mellina Tobing, Johannes Johny Koynja, Rianto, Nina Yuliana, and Juliana Mangngi. 2022. Pengantar Antropologi. Purbalingga: Eureka Media Aksara.

Ramle, Muhamad Rozaimi, and Miftachul Huda. 2022. “Between Text and Context: Understanding Hadith through Asbab al-Wurud.” Religions 13(2):92. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13020092.

Rizkiy, M. Inul. 2025. “Bridging the Methodological Gap: Emic and Etic Paradigms in Evolving the Living Hadith Studies.” Jurnal Living Hadis 10(2):139–60. https://doi.org/10.14421/livinghadis.2025.6578.

Rohmana, Jajang A. 2015. “Pendekatan Antropologi dalam Studi Living Hadis di Indonesia: Sebuah Kajian Awal.” Holistic al-Hadis 1(2):247–88. https://doi.org/10.32678/holistic.v1i2.920.

Rudyansjah, Tony, Muhammad Damm, Ade Solihat, Geger Riyanto, Imam Ardhianto, and Naeni Amanulloh. 2012. Antropologi Agama: Wacana-Wacana Mutakhir dalam Kajian Religi dan Budaya. Jakarta: UI-Press.

Sagir, Akhmad, Riza Saputra, Hanafi, and Latifah Abdul Majid. 2025. “Study of Living Hadith on the Wiridan Tradition after Dawn Prayer until Isyraq in Banjar Society, Kalimantan Selatan.” Jurnal Living Hadis 10(1):123–37. https://doi.org/10.14421/livinghadis.2025.5280.

Saputra, Edriagus, Nana Gustianda, Novizal Wendry, Arwansyah bin Kirin, Zakiyah, Afrinaldi, Amal Syahidin, and Alven Putra. 2024. “Living Hadith: Concept, Role, and Development in Indonesia.” Islam Transformatif: Journal of Islamic Studies 8(2):148–62. https://doi.org/10.30983/it.v8i2.8884.

Sattar, Abdul, Mohammad Fahmi bin Abdul Hamid, Khairul Azhar bin Meerangani, and Moh Nor Ichwan. 2026. “Event Contextualization in Hadith Interpretation: A Framework for Reassessing Problematic Hadith Narratives.” Jurnal Studi Ilmu-Ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Hadis 27(1):127–54. https://doi.org/10.14421/qh.v27i1.6418.

Schielke, Samuli. 2009. “Being Good in Ramadan: Ambivalence, Fragmentation, and the Moral Self in the Lives of Young Egyptians.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 15(S1):S24–S40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2009.01540.x.

Starrett, Gregory. 1995. “The Hexis of Interpretation: Islam and the Body in the Egyptian Popular School.” American Ethnologist 22(4):953–69. https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.1995.22.4.02a00150.

Sumbulah, Umi, Muhammad Zainuddin, and Dio Alif Bawazier. 2021. “Sunnah Ghairu Tasyri‘iyyah Yusuf Al-Qardhawi’s Perspective and Its Relevance in Building Religious Moderation.” Jurnal Living Hadis 6(2):197–215. https://doi.org/10.14421/livinghadis.2021.2732.

Suryadilaga, Muhammad Alfatih. 2014. “Pembacaan Hadis dalam Perspektif Antropologi.” ALQALAM: Jurnal Kajian Keislaman 31(1):1–22.

Wasman, Mesraini, and Suwendi. 2023. “A Critical Approach to Prophetic Traditions: Contextual Criticism in Understanding Hadith.” Al-Jami’ah: Journal of Islamic Studies 61(1):1–17. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2023.611.1-17.