Intellectual Polarization among Gayo Muslims Following the Dutch Ethical Policy

Polarisasi Intelektual Muslim Gayo Pasca Kebijakan Politik Etis Belanda

Authors

  • Zikri Iwan Sempena UIN Sunan Kalijaga

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22373/ijihc.v6i1.7501

Keywords:

Polarisasi Intektual Muslim, Gayo, Sejarah, politik etis

Abstract

Abstract

The implementation of the Dutch Ethical Policy, particularly in the field of education, marked a turning point in the cultural development of the Indonesian archipelago. It fostered the rise of a new intellectual class driven by aspirations for reform and emancipation, who articulated their ideas through socio-religious and educational organizations. This study investigates the intellectual polarization among Gayo Muslims that emerged in the wake of this policy. It addresses two core inquiries: the causes behind the polarization and its subsequent dynamics. Adopting a historical method with a socio-cultural approach, the research finds that the Dutch educational system significantly influenced this intellectual divide. Initially resisted by traditionalist circles who perceived it as a deviation from Islamic orthodoxy the Western model of education gradually produced a cohort of critical thinkers. These individuals began to challenge established religious rituals, labeling them as inconsistent with the essence of Islam.  As a result, Gayo Muslim intellectuals became ideologically fragmented into two primary camps: the traditionalist group (Kaom Tue) and the modernist or reformist group (Kaom Mude).

References

Abdurrahman Dudung. 2019. Metodologi Penelitian Sejarah Islam. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Ombak.

Arfiansyah. 2020. “Islam Dan Budaya Masyarakat Gayo, Provinsi Aceh: Kajian Sejarah Dan Sosial.” Al-Jami’ah: Journal of Islamic Studies 1 (1): 1–31. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2010.482.321-342.

Badrun, Sujadi, Idi Warsah, Imron Muttaqin, and Ruly Morganna. 2023. “Pancasila, Islam, and Harmonising Socio-Cultural Conflict in Indonesia.” Al-Jami’ah 61 (1): 137–56. https://doi.org/10.14421/AJIS.2023.611.137-156.

Bowen, John R. 1993. “A Modernist Muslim Poetic: Irony and Social Critique in Gayo Islamic Verse.” The Journal of Asian Studies 52 (3): 629–46. https://doi.org/10.2307/2058857.

Broersma, R. 1925. Atjeh Als Land Voor Handel En Bedrijp. Utrecht.

Fakhriansyah, Muhammad, and Intan Patoni. 2019. “Akses Pendidikan Bagi Pribumi Pada Periode Etis” 8 (2): 122–47.

Hurgronje, Cristian Snouck. 1895. De Atjehers. Batavia: Batavia Landsdrukkerij.

Iswanto, Sufandi, Teuku Kusnafizal, Muhza Kamza, and Muhammad Haikal. 2022. “Minangkabau Migratioan to Tanoh Gayo, Aceh: History,Factors and Impacts” 7 (1): 29–41. https://doi.org/10.31947/etnosia.v7i1.19610.

Kartodirjo, Sartono. 1992. Penekatan Ilmu Sosial Dalam Metodologi Sejarah. Edited by Sarwono Pusposaputro. II. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Ombak.

Kruger, Ronald. 1984. De Onderwijs-Facileiteiten Van Aceh Tengah. Rotterdam: Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam.

M Lapidus, Ira. 2002. A History of Islamic Societies. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

PaEni, Mukhlis. 2003. Riak Di Laut Tawar. Pertama. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada Press.

Rizal, Muhammad. 2016. Pendidikan Dayah Dalam Bingkai Otonomi Khusus Aceh. 1st ed. Lhoksemawe: Sefa Bumi Persada.

Susilo, Agus &, and Isbandiyah. 2018. “Politik Etis Dan Pengruhnya Bagi Lahirnya Pergerakan Bangsa Indonesia.” Historia 6 (2): 403–16.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-31

How to Cite

Sempena, Z. I. (2025). Intellectual Polarization among Gayo Muslims Following the Dutch Ethical Policy: Polarisasi Intelektual Muslim Gayo Pasca Kebijakan Politik Etis Belanda. Indonesian Journal of Islamic History and Culture, 6(1), 71–82. https://doi.org/10.22373/ijihc.v6i1.7501