Peer Review Process

All manuscripts submitted to the JALR journal must obey the aims and scope and the authors' guidelines of the journal. The submitted manuscripts must demonstrate scientific distinction or novelty appropriate to their aims and scope. All manuscripts have to avoid plagiarism. All authors are required to use plagiarism detection software to check for similarity; using Turnitin is recommended. In the JALR journal, editors have checked the plagiarism using the Turnitin software. The research article submitted to this journal will be peer-reviewed by at least 2 (two) or more expert reviewers, having an outstanding reputation in their field. JALR journal has ensured that all reviewers have no conflicts of interest. The reviewers have provided a fairly scientific statement to improve the manuscript's quality and have also stated, objectively, whether the manuscript can be published with major/minor revisions or rejected. The type of review is an international, double-blind, peer-reviewed journal. The final decision on article acceptance will be made by the Editors based on the reviewers’ comments. Publication of accepted articles and the sequence of published articles will be made by the Editor-in-Chief. The sequence of consideration, the geographical distribution of authors, and the thematic issue are among the main reasons for publication. The submitted manuscript will be reviewed within 4 (four months) of the submission date, based on the reviewers’ feedback, and the reviewed manuscript will be treated confidentially and fairly prior to publication.

The JALR Journal employs a double-blind peer-review system to ensure the quality, integrity, and objectivity of the publication process. In this system, both the authors’ and reviewers’ identities are concealed throughout the review process.