A Fiqh Jinayah Review on the Implementation of Social Work Criminal in Law Number 1 of 2023
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22373/fvp4yp12Keywords:
Social Work Crime, New Criminal Code, Fiqh Jinayah, Ta'zīr, Maqāṣid al-'UqūbahAbstract
The reform of the criminal law through Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the New Criminal Code presents the social work penalty as a non-prison principal crime that is oriented towards rehabilitation and restoration, while responding to the problem of over-capacity of correctional institutions in Indonesia. This research aims to answer three primary problems: first, how social work crimes are regulated in the New Criminal Code as an alternative punishment; second, what mechanisms and fundamental challenges exist in its implementation within the national criminal system; and third, how social work penalties are reviewed from the perspective of fiqh jinayah. Employing a normative juridical method supported by legislative, conceptual, legal policy, and comparative approaches, this study analyzes primary and secondary legal materials descriptively and analytically. The results reveal that Article 65 jo. Article 85 regulates social work crimes in relative detail, covering imposition conditions and technical aspects. However, its implementation across pre-adjudication, adjudication, and post-adjudication stages faces critical challenges, including weak informed consent standards, unclear parameters of legitimate reasons in criminal conversion, limited institutional capacity of Bapas, a prison-oriented legal culture, the absence of standardized sentencing guidelines, and a lack of implementing regulations, alongside the systemic risk of net widening. From a fiqh jinayah perspective, social work penalties cannot be fully equated with ta'zīr as a strict legal category, yet they demonstrate profound functional harmony with the core goals of 'uqūbah namely iṣlāḥ, zajr, and ta'dīb. This study concludes that the normative strength of social work penalties lacks adequate technical implementation readiness, making the strengthening of implementing regulations and deeper empirical studies an urgent necessity for the long-term sustainability of this policy.
References
Abdullah, Ove Syaifudin, Maidina Rahmawati, Desain Sampul, dan Ridlo Ilwafa. Orientasi Implementasi Pidana Kerja Sosial sebagai Alternatif Pidana Non-Pemenjaraan dalam KUHP 2023. jakarta selatan: Institute for Criminal justice Reform, 2024.
Al-Mubarakfuri, Safiyyurahman. Sirah Nabawiyah. terj. Kathur Suhardi. Jakarta: Pustaka Al-Kautsar, 2001.
Apri, Listiyanto, Panggabean Mompang L, dan Siregar Rospita Adelina. “Pidana Kerja Sosial dalam KUHP Baru : Tantangan dan Harapan Perwujudan Keadilan Restoratif di Indonesia.” jurnal Hukum Mimbar Justitia 11, no. 1 (2025).
Arafat, Muhammad. “Paradigma Pemidanaan Baru dalam KUHP 2023: Alternatif Sanksi dan Transformasi Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia.” jurnal Ilmu Hukum 2, no. 1 (2025): 33–34.
Arga Chon Feriandref, Eka Ermala, Othman Ballan, Mubaraq, Duwi Aryadi. “Transformasi Tujuan Pemidanaan di Indonesia: Systematic Literature Review Mengenai Perkembangan Teori, Kebijakan, Dan Implemntasi Keadilan Restoratif di Era Baru Hukum Pidana.” Iuris Studia: Jurnal kajian Hukum 7, no. 1 (2026): 26.
At-Tuwaijiri, Muhammad bin Ibrahim. Ensiklopedi Islam Al-Kamil. Diedit oleh Achmad Munir Badjeber. Jakarta: Darus Sunnah, 2017.
Audah, Abdul Qadir. Sistem Hukum Pidana Islam (At-Tasyri‘ al-Jinā’ī al-Islāmī Muqāranan bi al-Qānūn al-Wad‘ī), Jilid 1. terj. Temu Anwar. Jakarta: PT Lentera Basritama, 1992.
Az-Zuhaili, Wahbah. Fiqih Islam wa Adillatuhu, Jilid 7. terj. Abdul Hayyie al-Kattani, et al. Jakarta: Gema Insani, 2011.
Bahnasi, Ahmad Fathi. Al-Siyāsah al-Jinā’iyyah fī al-Syarī‘ah al-Islāmiyyah. Kairo: Dār al-Syurūq, 1984.
Bousaeed, Salman Duaij Hamad. “Alternative Punishments to Imprisonment in Islamic Jurisprudence and its Contemporary Forms in the Bahraini Penal Code and Alternative Measures No. 18 of 2017.” Dirasat: Sharia and Law Sciences 48, no. 4 (2021): 99–114.
Bowen, By Nigel Bennett & Phil. “The Future of Unpaid Work. Payback with purpose.” Centre for Justice Innovation, 2022.
Cut Nurita. “Konsep Keadilan Restoratif dalam Jinayah Islam dan Implementasinya pada Sistem Peradilan Indonesia.” ARBITER: Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Hukum 8, no. 1 (2026).
Darsi Darsi, Halil Halil. “Ta’zir dalam Perspektif Fiqh Jinayat.” AL-QISTHU Jurnal Kajian Ilmu-ilmu Hukum 16, no. 2 (2019).
Gill Mclvor, Kristel Beyens, Ester Blay and Miranda Boone. “Community service in Belgium, the Netherlands, Scotland and Spain: a comparative perspective.” European Journal of Probation 2, no. 1 (2010).
Husin, Umar. “Formulasi penanganan sanksi pidana kerja sosial terhadap pelaku korupsi berbasis keadilan.” jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure 23, no. 4 (2023): 495–506.
Imam Syafei. “pelaksanaan pidana kerja sosial berdasarkan UU Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 Tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.” Vol. 5, 2026.
Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (2023).
———. Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 Tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak (2012).
———. Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2022 Tentang Pemasyarakatan (2022).
Indriani Sepsilia, Lies Sulistiani, dan Wanodyo Sulistyani. “Pidana Kerja Sosial Dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia : Analisis Terhadap Potensi Labeling Dalam Kebijakan Pidana Kerja Sosial.” Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi 14, no. 42 (2026): 86–106.
Kantorowicz, Elena. “The ‘Net-Widening’ Problem and its Solutions: The Road to a Cheaper Sanctioning System.” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2014.
Kejaksaan Agung Republik Indonesia. Pedoman Jaksa Agung Nomor 4 Tahun 2023 tentang Pengawasan Penahanan Kota dan Penahanan Rumah pada Tahap Penyidikan dan Penuntutan. (2023).
kompas.com. “Pengadilan Negeri Banda Aceh, Putusan Nomor 34/Pid.Sus/2026/PN Bna, diakses melalui "Ayah Telantarkan Anak, PN Banda Aceh Jatuhkan Hukuman kerja Sosial 100 Jam.,” 2026. https://regional.kompas.com/read/2026/06/29/154500078/ayah-telantarkan-anak-pn-banda-aceh-jatuhkan-hukuman-kerja-sosial-100-jam.
Michael Tonry. “Intermediate Sanctions in Sentencing Guidelines.” Crime and Justice 23 (1998).
Muhammad Idris Nasution, Muhammad Ali, Fauziah Lubis. “Pembaruan Sistem Pemidanaan di Indonesia : Kajian Literatur atas KUHP Baru.” Judge : Jurnal Hukum 05, no. 01 (2024).
Muslich, Ahmad Wardi. Hukum Pidana Islam (Fiqh Jinayah). Cet. ke-2. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2005.
Ni Komang Sutrisni, I Nengah Susrama. “Konsep Ideal Penerapan Pidana Kerja Sosial dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Melalui Sistem Kolaborasi.” Jurnal Hukum Saraswati (JHS). 5, no. 2 (2023): 408–19.
P.A.F . Lamintang. Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Bandung: Sinar Grafika, 2014.
Rudi Hartono Nainggolan. “Pidana kerja sosial Salah Satu Alternatif Mengurangi Kelebihan Kapasitas Di lembaga Pemasyarakatan.” Jurnal Pemasyarakatan Gevangenen Menolong Warga Binaan Menjadi Orang Baik, 2022, 41–70.
Soviani, Metty Ferriska dan Karantika Surya. “Pidana Kerja Sosial dalam KUHP Baru: Alternatif Pemidanaan yang Berorientasi Pemulihan,” 2026.
The Atjeh Net. “Pengadilan Negeri Banda Aceh, Putusan Nomor 64/Pid.B/2026/PN Bna, diakses melalui " Hakim PN Banda Aceh Vonis Guru Pelaku Penipuan Rumah dengan Pidana Kerja Sosial 150 Jam,” 2026. https://www.theatjeh.net/2026/07/hakim-pn-banda-aceh-vonis-guru-pelaku.html.
Topo Santoso. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana Islam. Jakarta: Rajawali pers, 2016.
united Nations General Assembly. “United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for Non-custodial Measures (the Tokyo Rules),” 1990.
Wibawa, Iskandar. “Pidana Kerja Sosial Dan Restitusi Sebagai Alternatif Pidana Penjara dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Indonesia.” Jurnal Media Hukum 24, no. 2 (2017).
Wilda Lestari. “Ta ’ zir Crimes in Islamic Criminal Law : Definition Legal Basis Types and Punishments.” Al-Qanun:Jurnal Kajian Sosial dan Hukum islam 05, no. 1 (2024).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Anisa Muttaqqillah, Safira Mustaqila, Yusnaidi Kamaruzzaman, Ghazal Lianne

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
















