DYSPHEMISM USED IN SELECED EPISODES OF SOUTH PARK ANIMATED SERIES SEASON 1 (1997)
Keywords:
Dysphemism, South Park Animated Series, TypesAbstract
Dysphemism is an expression that involves the deliberate selection of words or phrases that are offensive, derogatory, vulgar, aimed to emphasize negativity, showing disapproval, or simply to display intimacy, which perfectly portrayed in this animated series. South Park animated series brings the ordinary, extraordinary, and peculiar plots, ranging about daily incidents until supernatural theme. This animated series challenged mainstream media by displaying offensive and strong language used by the characters throughout the series. The purposes of this research are; First, to identify the types of dysphemism. Second, investigate the motives of dysphemism. Third, discover the most dominant type and motive of dysphemism. The researchers employed the theories from Allan and Burridge (1991) to analyze the types and motives presented in these episodes. This research was conducted in qualitative research. The researchers used technique of documentation to collect the data and employed content analysis technique to analyze the data. The results are; First, there are seven types of dysphemism identified in the selected episodes; (a) Profanity, (b) Dysphemistic epithets, (c) Euphemistic dysphemism, (d) Dysphemistic euphemism, (e) “-ist” dysphemism, (f) Dysphemism in forms of naming and addressing, (g) Verbal play. Second, there are four underlying motives of dysphemism; (a) Fear and distaste, (b) Hatred and contempt, (c) Desire to offensively demonstrate such feelings and to downgrade the denotatum, (d) Amuse an audience. Third, the most dominant type of these episodes is profanity, which identified in 40 occurrences, and the most dominant motive is the desire to offensively demonstrate such feelings and to downgrade the denotatum, identified within 84 occurrences.
References
Allan, K., & Burridge, K. (1991). Euphemism & Dysphemism Language used as Shield and Weapon. New York: Oxford University Press.
Allan, K., & Burridge, K. (2006). Forbidden Words: Taboo and the Censoring of
Language. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Atieno, O., P. (2009). An Analysis of the Strengths and Limitation of Qualitative and Quantitative Research Paradigms. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 13, 13-18.
Battistella, E. L. (2005). Bad Language: Are Some Words Better than Others? New York: Oxford University Press.
Cuddon, J. (1979). A Dictionary of Literary Terms (Revised Ed.). London: Andre Deutsch Limited.
Firdaus, S. (2018). Dysphemism in Riverdale TV Series Season 1. Thesis. Unpublished. Sunan Ampel State Islamic University
Irawan, R. (2023). Personality Disorders of the Main Character as seen in the Deadpool Comics Published by Marvel Comics. Thesis. Unpublished. Islamic State University Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi.
Kadoor1y, O. A., & Mugair, S. K. (2021). A Pragmatic Study of Euphemism and Dysphemism in Donald Trump's Political Speeches. PalArch's Journal of Archaelogy of Egypt / Egyptology, 2741-2753.
Leech, G. N. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. New York: Longman Inc.
Mason, J. (2002). Qualitative Researching: 2nd Edition. London: SAGE Publications Ltd
Maxwell, J. A. (1996). Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach
Second Edition. SAGE Publication.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). An Expanded Sourcebook: Qualitative Data Analysis. Sage Publications, Inc.
Phillip, M. (2014). Qualitative Content Analysis: theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution. A CC BY-NC-ND License (Attribution Non Commercial-No Derivatives
Rabiyeva, M. G. (2022). Dysphemism or Euphemism? Central Asian Journal of Literature, Philosophy and Culture, 61-65.
Rawson, H. (1989). Wicked Words: A Treasury of Curses, Insults, Put-Downs, and Other Formerly Unprintable Terms from Anglo-Saxons Times to the Present. New York: Crown Publishers, Inc.
Sapir, E. (1921). Language: An Introduction to the Study of Speech. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc.
Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press
