THE SYSTEM OF RETURNING CONFISCATED LAND OBJECTS AT THE BANDA ACEH CITY DISTRICT COURT: A STUDY OF AL-MILKIYAH RIGHTS IN FIQH MUAMALAH

Cut Yustianiansyah; Azka Amalia Jihad

doi:10.22373/al-mudharabah.v5i1.4591

Authors

Cut Yustianiansyah Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh
Azka Amalia Jihad Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22373/al-mudharabah.v5i1.4591

Keywords:

Banda Aceh, Court Decision, Fiqh Muamalah, Hak Al-Milkiyah, Land Dispute

Abstract

This article aims to examine the system of returning confiscated objects at the Banda Aceh city district court according to the perspective of Al-Milkiyah Rights in Muamalah Jurisprudence. The approach taken by the author is juridical-empirical research. The main data is obtained from interviews with the parties, and a number of applicable laws and regulations, while secondary data is obtained from the results of research related to this research. The results showed that the system for returning confiscated objects was carried out based on the provisions of the SOP. In the decision of the Banda Aceh District Court No.64/Pdt.G/2020/PN Bna, the decision of the Banda Aceh High Court No. 72/PDT/2021/PT BNA, the decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia No. 4173 K/Pdt/2022 regarding unlawful acts, namely the Defendant occupying and obstructing the plaintiff to take control of the disputed land that he had obtained from the winning auction No. 533/01/2020, and the execution of the execution No. 533/01/2020. 533/01/2020, and the execution respondent did not voluntarily vacate the land, then the granting of the request for execution will be executed by force with the execution agency. The judge ordered the Registrar of the Banda Aceh District Court and bailiffs accompanied by two witnesses to carry out execution against the land in order to ensure law enforcement by handing over the object of the land plot to the applicant for execution by order of the judge. From this decision, it was decided to carry out the execution of the land to fulfil the decision that has permanent legal force. The land object in dispute must be returned based on an inkrah court decision for certainty of law enforcement.

References

Achmad, Yusnedi. Aspek Hukum Dalam Ekonomi. Yogyakarta: Deepublish, 2015.
Armia, Muhammad Siddiq, Zahlul Pasha Karim, Huwaida Tengku-Armia, Muhammad Sauqi Bin-Armia, Chairul Fahmi, and Armiadi Musa. ‘Post Amendment of Judicial Review in Indonesia: Has Judicial Power Distributed Fairly?’ Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies 7 (2022): 525. https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/jils7&id=529&div=&collection=.
Ahdiyat Agus Susila. “Al-Mal (Hak Milik) Dalam Perspektif Fuqaha”. Iqtishodiyah: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Islam. 3(2). 2017.
Akbar, Ali. "Konsep kepemilikan dalam Islam." Jurnal Ushuluddin. 18.(2). 2012.
Al‐Syalabi, Musthafa Ahmad. “Al‐Madhal fi Ta’rif bil‐Fiqh Islami wa Qawa’id al‐Milkiyah wal Uqud Fih”. Mesir: Darul Ta’rif, Jilid II. 1960.
An-Nabahan, M. Faruq. “Sistem Ekonomi Islam: Pilihan Setelah Kegagalan Sistem Kapitalis Dan Sosialis”. Yogyakarta: UII Pers. 2000.
Batubara, Sarmiana. "Kepemilikan Relatif (Al-Milkiyah Al-Muqayyadah) Privat dan Publik dalam Ekonomi Islam." JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah) 16.(2).2017.
Dian Dwi Jayanti, “Apakah barang sitaan dapat dikembalikan?”, https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/apakah-barang-sitaan-dapat-dikembalikan
lt637f2bf0a5396/ (Diakses: 19 April 2024)
Djapai, Maria Prisilia. “Pengelolaan Benda Sitaan Menurut Pasal 44 KUHAP”. Lex Crimen.. 6(7). 2017.
Djamil, Fathurrahman. Hukum Ekonomi Islam: Sejarah, Teori, dan Konsep. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2023.
Fahmi, Chairul. ‘The Impact of Regulation on Islamic Financial Institutions Toward the Monopolistic Practices in the Banking Industrial in Aceh, Indonesia’. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun 11, no. 2 (30 May 2023): 667–86. https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v11i2.923.
———. ‘TRANSFORMASI FILSAFAT DALAM PENERAPAN SYARIAT ISLAM (Analisis Kritis Terhadap Penerapan Syari’at Islam Di Aceh)’. Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam 6, no. 2 (2012): 167–76.
Hakim, Ahmad Luqman, and Irfa Munandar. ‘THE LEGALITY OF MURABAHAH CONTRACTS SYSTEM IN ISLAMIC FINANCING INSTITUTIONS: An Analysis of Muḥammad Bin Ṣāliḥ Al-Uṡaimīn‘s Thought’. JURISTA: Jurnal Hukum Dan Keadilan 7, no. 1 (2023): 24–36. https://doi.org/10.1234/jurista.v7i1.66.
Hasil Wawancara dengan Budiwansyah, S.H. Jurusita di Pengadilan Negeri Kota Banda Aceh Pada Tanggal 28 Desember 2023.
Iwandi, Iwandi, Rustam Efendi, and Chairul Fahmi. ‘THE CONCEPT OF FRANCHISING IN THE INDONESIAN’S CIVIL LAW AND ISLAM’. Al-Mudharabah: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Keuangan Syariah 4, no. 2 (29 September 2023): 14–39. https://doi.org/10.22373/al-mudharabah.v5i2.3409.
Kompasiana.com, “Hakikat Kepemilikan dalam Perspektif Islam”, Diakses dari situs https://www.kompasiana.com/hakikat-kepemilikan-dalam-perspektif-islam pada tanggal 21 desember 2023.
Manumpahi, Romy Boby. “Pengembalian Barang Bukti Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana Berdasarkan KUHAP”. Lex Crimen. 10(5). 2021.
Pangiuk, Ambok. “Kepemilikan Ekonomi Kapitalis Dan Sosialis (Konsep Tauhid DalamSistem Islam)”. Jurnal Kajian Ekonomi Islam Dan Kemasyarakatan. 4(2). 2011.
Siddiq-Armia, Muhammad. Penentuan Metode Dan Pendekatan Penelitian Hukum.
Subekti, R. & R. Tjitrosudibio. "Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Perdata (KUHPerdata)." Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita. 2003.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana,https://jdih.kemenkeu.go.id/fulltext/1981/8TAHUN~1981UU.HTM (Diakses: 29 desember 2024)