The Impact of the Realistic Mathematics Education Approach on Elementary School Students' Numeracy Skills

Authors

  • Azmil Hasan Lubis Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4880-3844
  • Syifa Defila Aryani Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh
  • Anzilar Rahmatan Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22373/jppg.v4i1.9947

Keywords:

Realistic mathematics education, mathematics learning, numeracy skill

Abstract

Mathematics is an essential discipline that students must master in order to solve various problems encountered in daily life. One of the competencies that supports the mastery of mathematics is numeracy skills. Several instructional approaches can be implemented to improve students’ numeracy skills, one of which is the Realistic Mathematics Education approach. This study aimed to examine the impact of the Realistic Mathematics Education approach on elementary school students’ numeracy skills in mathematics learning. This research employed a quantitative approach using an experimental method. The experimental design used was a pretest–posttest control group design involving an experimental class and a control class. The population of this study consisted of elementary school students in Banda Aceh, with samples drawn from SD Negeri 16 Banda Aceh and SD Negeri 54 Banda Aceh. The sampling technique used was cluster random sampling. The data were quantitative data obtained through a numeracy test. The collected data were analyzed using descriptive statistics by calculating the mean and standard deviation, and inferential statistics using paired sample t-tests and independent sample t-tests. The results showed that the Realistic Mathematics Education approach had a significant impact on students’ numeracy skills. This finding was indicated by the higher mean score of the experimental class compared to the control class. In addition, the standard deviation of the experimental class was lower than that of the control class, indicating more consistent learning outcomes. The paired sample t-test results showed a significance value of less than 0.05, indicating a significant difference in students’ numeracy skills before and after the treatment. The independent sample t-test results also showed a significance value of less than 0.05, indicating a significant difference between the experimental and control groups. Based on these findings, the Realistic Mathematics Education approach can be used as an alternative instructional approach to strengthen elementary school students’ numeracy skills in mathematics learning.

References

Anastasi, A., & Urbina, S. (1997). Psychological testing (7th ed.). Prentice Hall.

Boaler, J. (2016). Mathematical mindsets: Unleashing students' potential through creative math, inspiring messages and innovative teaching. Jossey-Bass.

British Educational Research Association. (2018). Ethical guidelines for educational research (4th ed.). BERA.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.

Etikan, I., & Bala, K. (2017). Sampling and sampling methods. Biometrics & Biostatistics International Journal, 5(6), 00149. https://doi.org/10.15406/bbij.2017.05.00149

Fauzan, A., Slettenhaar, D., & Plomp, T. (2002). Traditional mathematics education vs. realistic mathematics education: Hoping for changes. In T. Plomp (Ed.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Mathematics Education (pp. 1–12). University of Twente.

Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2019). How to design and evaluate research in education (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Freudenthal, H. (1991). Revisiting mathematics education: China lectures. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2007). Educational research: An introduction (8th ed.). Pearson Education.

Geiger, V., Goos, M., & Forgasz, H. (2015). A rich interpretation of numeracy for the 21st century: A survey of the state of the field. ZDM Mathematics Education, 47(4), 531–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0708-1

Goos, M., Geiger, V., & Dole, S. (2014). Transforming professional practice in numeracy teaching. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 26(4), 703–728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-014-0126-3

Gravemeijer, K., & Doorman, M. (1999). Context problems in realistic mathematics education: A calculus course as an example. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 39(1–3), 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003749919816

Hiebert, J., & Grouws, D. A. (2007). The effects of classroom mathematics teaching on students’ learning. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 371–404). Information Age Publishing.

Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. National Academy Press.

Laurens, T., Batlolona, F. A., Batlolona, J. R., & Leasa, M. (2018). How does realistic mathematics education (RME) improve students’ mathematics cognitive achievement? EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(2), 569–578. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/76959

Niss, M., & Højgaard, T. (2019). Mathematical competencies revisited. Springer.

OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 results (Volume I): What students know and can do. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en

Sembiring, R. K., Hadi, S., & Dolk, M. (2008). Reforming mathematics learning in Indonesian classrooms through RME. ZDM Mathematics Education, 40(6), 927–939. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-008-0125-9

Treffers, A. (1987). Three dimensions: A model of goal and theory description in mathematics instruction. Reidel Publishing Company.

Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (2003). The didactical use of models in realistic mathematics education: An example from a longitudinal trajectory on percentage. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 54(1), 9–35. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDUC.0000005212.03219.dc

Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Drijvers, P. (2014). Realistic mathematics education. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education (pp. 521–525). Springer.

Wijaya, A., van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Doorman, M. (2015). Opportunity-to-learn context-based tasks provided by mathematics textbooks. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 89(1), 41–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-015-9595-1

Yilmaz, Z. (2020). The effect of collaborative learning on mathematics achievement. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 51(6), 915–932. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2019.1606992

Zulkardi, Z., & Putri, R. I. I. (2010). Developing mathematics learning using realistic mathematics education approach. IndoMS Journal on Mathematics Education, 1(1), 21–32.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-28

How to Cite

Lubis, A. H., Aryani, S. D., & Rahmatan, A. (2026). The Impact of the Realistic Mathematics Education Approach on Elementary School Students’ Numeracy Skills. Jurnal Pendidikan Profesi Guru, 4(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.22373/jppg.v4i1.9947