FROM RIBĀ TO IḤSĀN: Q 3:130–136 AND THE NORMATIVE ARCHITECTURE OF SHARIA ECONOMIC LAW

Authors

  • Sulfanwandi Sulfanwandi Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh
  • Andri Kiawan Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22373/al-mudharabah.v7i2.10704

Keywords:

Islamic finance, infaq, maqashid al-shariah, riba, shariah economic law

Abstract

This article reconstructs Q 3:130–136 as a normative foundation for sharia economic law. Existing readings frequently isolate the prohibition of ribā in Q 3:130 from the commands to pursue forgiveness, spend in prosperity and adversity, restrain anger, pardon others, practise isān, and discontinue wrongdoing. Using normative legal research, munāsabah, lexical analysis, comparative tafsīr, and a maqāid al-sharīʿah framework, the study examines how the sequence integrates transactional legality with distributive justice, ethical governance, and remediation. It argues that the passage establishes a four-layer architecture. First, ribā marks a prohibited mode of gain that cannot be legitimated by exploiting vulnerability. Second, infāq affirms the social function and circulation of wealth. Third, restraint, pardon, and isān govern the exercise of contractual and institutional power, especially when a counterparty experiences hardship. Fourth, remembrance, repentance, and non-persistence require institutions to identify, correct, and remedy sharia non-compliance. Indonesian banking legislation, the Compilation of Sharia Economic Law, DSN-MUI fatwas, and contemporary OJK sharia-governance rules are used as a contextual—not exegetical—test of this model. The article concludes that sharia economic law cannot be reduced to formal avoidance of prohibited clauses; it must align contractual form, economic substance, institutional conduct, and corrective accountability with justice and public welfare.

References

Abdel Haleem, M. A. S. The Qur’an: A New Translation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.

Al-Biqāʿī, Burhān al-Dīn Ibrāhīm. Naẓm al-Durar fī Tanāsub al-Āyāt wa-l-Suwar. Cairo: Dār al-Kitāb al-Islāmī, n.d.

Al-Rāzī, Fakhr al-Dīn. Mafātīḥ al-Ghayb. Beirut: Dār Iḥyāʾ al-Turāth al-ʿArabī, 1999.

Al-Zuḥaylī, Wahbah. Al-Fiqh al-Islāmī wa-Adillatuhu. Damascus: Dār al-Fikr, 1985.

Al-Zuḥaylī, Wahbah. Al-Tafsīr al-Munīr fī al-ʿAqīdah wa-l-Sharīʿah wa-l-Manhaj. Damascus: Dār al-Fikr al-Muʿāṣir, 1991.

Asutay, Mehmet. “Conceptualising and Locating the Social Failure of Islamic Finance: Aspirations of Islamic Moral Economy vs the Realities of Islamic Finance.” Asian and African Area Studies 11, no. 2 (2012): 93–113.

Asutay, Mehmet. “Islamic Moral Economy: Bringing Back Substantive Morality to Islamic Finance through Qard al-Hasan.” Global Policy 16, suppl. 1 (2025): 7–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13487.

Auda, Jasser. Maqasid al-Shariah as Philosophy of Islamic Law: A Systems Approach. London: International Institute of Islamic Thought, 2008.

Azza, Rozatul Fadilla, Chairul Fahmi, and Riza Afrian Mustaqim. ‘LEGAL PROTECTION FOR LOCAL PRODUCTS IN ASEAN MARKET LIBERALISM: A Legal Analysis and Fiqh Muamalah Perspective’. Al-Mudharabah: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Keuangan Syariah 7, no. 1 (January 2026): 128–51. https://doi.org/10.22373/al-mudharabah.v7i1.9675.

Chapra, M. Umer. The Future of Economics: An Islamic Perspective. Leicester: Islamic Foundation, 2000.

El-Gamal, Mahmoud A. Islamic Finance: Law, Economics, and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.

Fahmi, Chairul, Audia Humairah, and Ayrin Sazwa. ‘MODEL OF LEGAL DISPUTE RESOLUTION FOR BUSINESS CONTRACT DEFAULT’. JURISTA: Jurnal Hukum Dan Keadilan 7, no. 2 (December 2023): 242–63. https://doi.org/10.22373/JURISTA.V7I2.228.

Fahmi, Chairul, and Syarifah Riyani. ‘ISLAMIC ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF THE ACEH SPECIAL AUTONOMY FUND MANAGEMENT’. Wahana Akademika: Jurnal Studi Islam Dan Sosial 11, no. 1 (July 2024): 1. https://doi.org/10.21580/wa.v11i1.20007.

Güney, Necmeddin. “Maqāṣid al-Sharīʿa in Islamic Finance: A Critical Analysis of Modern Discourses.” Religions 15, no. 1 (2024): 114. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15010114.

Hamka. Tafsir Al-Azhar. Jakarta: Pustaka Panjimas, 1982.

Hamour, Mohamed, Mohammad Hassan Shakil, Ishaq Mustapha Akinlaso, and Mashiyat Tasnia. “Contemporary Issues of Form and Substance: An Islamic Law Perspective.” ISRA International Journal of Islamic Finance 11, no. 1 (2019): 124–136. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIF-01-2018-0006.

Ibn ʿĀshūr, Muḥammad al-Ṭāhir. Al-Taḥrīr wa-l-Tanwīr. Tunis: al-Dār al-Tūnisiyyah li-l-Nashr, 1984.

Ibn Kathīr, Ismāʿīl ibn ʿUmar. Tafsīr al-Qurʾān al-ʿAẓīm. Edited by Sāmī ibn Muḥammad Salāmah. Riyadh: Dār Ṭaybah, 1999.

Indonesia. Law No. 21 of 2008 on Sharia Banking, as amended by Law No. 4 of 2023 on Financial Sector Development and Strengthening.

Kamali, Mohammad Hashim. Shari’ah Law: An Introduction. Oxford: Oneworld, 2008.

Laldin, Mohamad Akram, and Hafas Furqani. “Developing Islamic Finance in the Framework of Maqasid al-Shari’ah: Understanding the Ends (Maqasid) and the Means (Wasa’il).” International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management 6, no. 4 (2013): 278–289.

Majelis Ulama Indonesia. Fatwa No. 1 of 2004 on Interest (Fa’idah).

Muhammad Achyar, Chairul Fahmi, and Riadhus Sholihin. ‘ISLAMIC LAW REVIEW OF MONOPOLY PRACTICES IN MODERN ECONOMICS’. Al-Mudharabah: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Keuangan Syariah 5, no. 2 (December 2024): 288–308. https://doi.org/10.22373/AL-MUDHARABAH.V5I2.6545.

National Sharia Board–Indonesian Council of Ulama (DSN-MUI). Fatwa No. 04/DSN-MUI/IV/2000 on Murābaḥah.

National Sharia Board–Indonesian Council of Ulama (DSN-MUI). Fatwa No. 47/DSN-MUI/II/2005 on Settlement of Murābaḥah Receivables for Customers Unable to Pay.

National Sharia Board–Indonesian Council of Ulama (DSN-MUI). Fatwa No. 48/DSN-MUI/II/2005 on Rescheduling Murābaḥah Receivables.

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. Regulation No. 2 of 2024 on the Implementation of Sharia Governance for Sharia Commercial Banks and Sharia Business Units.

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. Regulation No. 22 of 2023 on Consumer and Public Protection in the Financial Services Sector.

Saeed, Abdullah. Islamic Banking and Interest: A Study of the Prohibition of Riba and Its Contemporary Interpretation. Leiden: Brill, 1996.

Saeed, Abdullah. “Some Reflections on the Contextualist Approach to Ethico-Legal Texts of the Quran.” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 71, no. 2 (2008): 221–237.

Shihab, M. Quraish. Tafsir Al-Mishbah: Pesan, Kesan dan Keserasian Al-Qur’an. Jakarta: Lentera Hati, 2002.

Siddiqi, Muhammad Nejatullah. Riba, Bank Interest and the Rationale of Its Prohibition. Jeddah: Islamic Research and Training Institute, 2004.

Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. Regulation No. 2 of 2008 on the Compilation of Sharia Economic Law.

Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. Regulation No. 14 of 2016 on the Procedure for Sharia Economic Cases.

Downloads

Published

12-08-2026

How to Cite

Sulfanwandi, Sulfanwandi, and Andri Kiawan. 2026. “FROM RIBĀ TO IḤSĀN: Q 3:130–136 AND THE NORMATIVE ARCHITECTURE OF SHARIA ECONOMIC LAW”. Al-Mudharabah: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Keuangan Syariah 7 (2):406-26. https://doi.org/10.22373/al-mudharabah.v7i2.10704.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.