FRIDAY PRAYER FOR THE PEOPLE WHO DO NOT GET RUKUK WITH THE IMAM IN THE SECOND RAKAAT
A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN THE HANAFI AND AL-SYAFI'I SCHOOLS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22373/ijomafim.v1i2.2827Keywords:
Friday prayer, masbuk, Ḥanafī, al-Syāfi‘ī.Abstract
The Friday prayers must perform in the jamaah (congregation), so it is not valid if someone does not get the jamaah, but ulemas differ on the criteria of it. According to Hanafi scholars, a person is considered in congregation prayer, even if only at the end of the Friday prayer. Meanwhile, according to the ulemas of the al-Syafi'ī school, a person is considered in the congregation if he has time to bow with the imam in the second rak'ah. The author examines the opinions and istinbat methods used by these two schools of thought with a comparative approach. It found that these two schools used the lughawiyyah method of istinbat, but the Hanafi school also used the causation method (ta'līlī). Each school adheres to the Hadith but differs in the editorial and transmission lines so that different interpretations. On the other hand, the Hanafi school of thought performs the qiyās of the Friday prayer with the traveler's prayer, that is, from the point of view of participating in the prayer of the imam together.
References
Abdurrahman, K.H.E. Perbandingan Mazhab. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algensindo, 2000.
Al-Bayhaqī. Sunan Al-Kubrā. Beirut: Dar al-Kutib al-‘ilmiyah, 2003.
Al-Fayruzzabadī, Majīd al-Dīn Muḥammad ibn Ya’qūb. Qāmūs Al-Muḥīṭ. Kairo: Dār al-Ḥadīṡ, 2008.
Al-Jaziri, Abdurraḥman. Al-Fiqh Ala Al-Mażahib Al-Arba’ah. Jakarta: Pustaka al-Kautsar, 2015.
Al-Zuḥailī, Wahbah. Al-Fiqh Al-Islāmī Wa Adillatuh. Jakarta: Gema Insani Press, 2011.
An-Naisaburi, Abu Husain Muslim. Shahih Muslim. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr, 2003.
As-Sarakhsi, Syamsuddin. Al-Mabsuth. Beirut: Dar al-Makrifah, n.d.
Asy-Syāfi’i, Muhammad ibn Idris. Al-Umm. Kairo: Dar Al-Wafa’, 2001.
Beyk, Muḥammad Khuḍarī. Tārīkh At-Tasyrī‘ Al-Islāmī. Beirut: Dar al Fikr, n.d.
Ibn Qudāmah. Al-Mughni’ Fī Fiqh Al-Imām Aḥmad Bin Ḥanbal Al-Syaibānī. Jeddah: Maktabah al-Sawādī, 2000.
Ibnu Rusyd. Bidayah Al-Mujtahid Wa Nihayah Al-Muqtasid. Jakarta: Pustaka al-Kautsar, 2015.
Ibrahim, Muslim. Pengantar Fiqh Muqaran. Jakarta: Erlangga, 1989.
Manẓūr, Ibn. Lisān Al-‘Arab. Kairo: Dār al-Hadīs, 2003.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. 1st ed. Jakarta: Kencana, 2005.
Muḥammad ‘Alī al-Sāyīs. Tārīkh Al-Fiqh Al-Islāmī. Beirut: Dar al-Kutib al-‘ilmiyah, n.d.
Muḥammad ibn Ismā‘īl Abū ‘Abd Allāh al-Bukhārī. Ṣaḥīḥ Al-Bukhārī. Beirut: Dār Ṭūq al-Najāh, 2001.
Sabil, Jabbar. Menalar Hukum Tuhan: Akar Penalaran Ta’lili Dalam Pemikiran Imam Al-Ghazali. Banda Aceh: LKaS, 2009. http://www.jabbarsabil.com/p/buku.html.
Syaikhu, and Norwili. Perbandingan Mazhab Fiqh: Penyesuaian Pendapat Di Kalangan Imam Mazhab. Yogyakarta: K-Media, 2019.
Syarifuddin, Amir. Beberapa Metode Ijtihad. Jakarta: Kencana, 2008.
Yanggo, Huzaemah Tahido. Pengantar Perbandingan Mazhab. Jakarta: Gaung Persada, 2011.
Zukhdi, Muhammad. Pengantar Studi Fikih Mazhab Syafi’i: Kajian Terhadap Imam Asy-Syafi’i Dan Ulama Syafi’iah. Banda Aceh: Bandar Publishing, 2020.
.png)
