ATTACHING NOSE TO THE PLACE OF PROSTRATION
COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SYĀFI‘Ī AND ḤANBALĪ SCHOOLS OF THOUGHT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22373/ijomafim.v1i2.2771Keywords:
attaching nose, place of prostration, al-Syāfi'ī, ḤanbalīAbstract
The government has implemented health protocols to limit the spread of Covid-19, including wearing masks. However, problems arise when wearing a mask while praying. According to the Ḥanbalī school of thought, this prayer is invalid. On the other hand, according to the ulemas of the al-Syafi'ī school, prayers are still valid even if a mask is covered the nose. The author is interested in examining the opinions and methods of these two schools with a comparative legal approach. The authors found that most ulemas of Ḥanbalī schools stated that the nose is a part of the body that must be attached to the place of prostration in prayer. The ulemas of the al-Syafi'i school state that only the forehead must touch the place of prostration, while the nose is only a suggestion. The ulemas of both schools use linguistic (lughawiyyah) and causation (ta‘līl) methods, but the results are different. It happens because of differences in the editorial hadith used as a source of law. The author concludes that the ulemas of these two schools have such tendencies about different editors' hadiths choosing.
References
‘Abd Allāh ibn Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad al-Ṭayyār. Wabal Al-Ghamamah Fī Syarḥ Umdah Al-Fiqh Li Ibn Qudāmah. Saudi Arabia: Dār al-Waṭan, 2011.
Abū Isḥāq al-Syiīazī. Al-Muhażżab Fī Fiqh Al-Imām Al-SyāfiĪ. Damaskus: Dār al-Qalam, 1996.
Abubakar, Al Yasa’. Metode Istislahiah: Pemanfaatan Ilmu Pengetahuan Dalam Ushul Fiqh. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group, 2016.
Al-Asyuṭī, Muṣṭafā ibn Sa‘d ibn ‘Abduh. Maṭālib Ūlī Al-Nuhā Fī Syarḥ Al-Ghāyah Al-Muntahā Fī Fiqh Al-Ḥanbalī. Beirut: Dar al-Kutib al-‘ilmiyah, 1971.
Al-Dāruqutnī. Sunan Al-Dāruqutnī. Beirut: Mū’assasah al-Risālah, 2004.
Al-Ghazālī. Al-Wajīz. Jakarta: Dar al-Kutib al-‘ilmiyah, 2004.
Al-Jaziri, Abdurraḥman. Al-Fiqh Ala Al-Mażahib Al-Arba’ah. Jakarta: Pustaka al-Kautsar, 2015.
Al-Juwaynī, Abd al-Mālik ibn Abd ‘Allāh ibn Yūsuf. Nihāyah Al-Maṭlab Fi Dirāyah Al-Mażhab. Jeddah: Dar Al-Minhāj, 2007.
Al-Malibarī, Zayn al-Dīn ibn ‘Abd al’Azīz. Fatḥ Al-Muīin. Surabaya: al-Hidayah, 2006.
Al-Nawawī, Muḥy al-Dīn ibn Syarf. Rawḍah Al-Ṭālibīn. Riyad: Dār ‘Ālam al-Kutub, 2003.
Al-Nawawi, Muhyiddin bin Syarf. Majmu’ Syarh Al-Muhazzab. Jakarta: Pustaka Azzam, 2009.
Al-Ramlī, Syihāb al-Dīn. Nihāyah Al-Muhtāj. Beirut: Dar al-Kutib al-‘ilmiyah, 2004.
Al-Yamanī, Abū al-Ḥusayn Yaḥyā ibn Abī al-Khayr Iibn Salīm al-‘Imrānī al-Syāfi‘ī. Al-Bayān Fī Mażhab Al-Imām Al-Syāfi‘Ī. Riyad: Dar Al-Minhāj, 2011.
Al-Zuḥailī, Wahbah. Al-Fiqh Al-Islāmī Wa Adillatuh. Jakarta: Gema Insani Press, 2011.
Al-Zuhaylī, Muḥammad. Al-Qawā‘id Al-Fiqhiyyah. Damaskus: Dar al-Fikr, 2008.
Diantha, I Made Pasek. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif; Dalam Justifikasi Teori Hukum. 3th ed. Jakarta: Kencana, 2019.
Ibn ‘Aqīl. Al-Tażkirah Fī Al-Fiqh ‘alā Mażhab Al-Imām Aḥmad Bin Muḥammad Bin Ḥanbal. Riyad: Dār Isybīliyā, 2001.
Ibnu Qayyim al-Jauziyyah. Zadul Ma’ad: Panduan Lengkap Meraih Kebahagiaan Dunia Akhirat. Jakarta: Pustaka al-Kautsar, 2008.
Ibnu Rusyd. Bidayah Al-Mujtahid Wa Nihayah Al-Muqtasid. Jakarta: Pustaka al-Kautsar, 2015.
Ibrahim, Muslim. Pengantar Fiqh Muqaran. Jakarta: Erlangga, 1989.
Qudāmah, Ibn. Al-Mughnī Syarḥ Al-Kabīr. Riyad: Dār ‘Ālam al-Kutub, 1997.
Rukajat, Ajat. Penelitian Pendekatan Kualitatif. Yogyakarta: Budi Utama, 2018.
Sabil, Jabbar. Menalar Hukum Tuhan: Akar Penalaran Ta’lili Dalam Pemikiran Imam Al-Ghazali. Banda Aceh: LKaS, 2009. http://www.jabbarsabil.com/p/buku.html.
Syams al-Dīn ibn Muḥammad ibn ‘Abd Allāh al-Zarkasyī. Syarḥ Al-Kabīr ‘alā Mukhtaṣar Al-Kharaqī. Riyad: Maktabah, 1993.
Syarīf al-Din Mūsā al-Hujawī al-Maqdisī. Al-Iqnā’ Fī Fiqh Al-Imām Aḥmad Ibn Ḥanbal. Beirut: Dār al-Ma‘rifah, 1998.
.png)
